Quick personal post for anyone following this blog (lost in the wilderness as it is, but it is not dead).
I am producing the Pendley Shakespeare Festival in Tring, Hertforshire this August. I have performed in it for the last few years, and I have now moved backstage. It promises to be a beautiful and enjoyable few weeks and well worth enjoying under the summer starlight.
If you want to book, click here.
Thursday, May 31, 2018
Saturday, April 15, 2017
The Crescent Moon is Absent as the Sun Sets - Thoughts From Istanbul
I wish I could have got a better photo of the moonrise that night. It came up over the Bosphorus, blood red; mirroring the colours of the western sky as the sun died away. A beautiful end to a beautiful day.
I had just returned from my first trip into the centre of Istanbul, emerging at the local Metro station which sits at the top of a nearby hillside in the north-west of the city. I wandered through a local neighbourhood which had shown a bustling high street, quiet backways and the call to prayer echoing up from the valley below. I descended towards the water down steep slopes populated by stray dogs, wild cats and domesciled saloon cars from Central Europe, and along winding roads that snaked through the Mediterranean greenery. When, suddenly, it rose - not crescent but crimson.
The whole scene was so close to Provence that it might have just been another stretch of the coast down beyond Nice. Though, from space, the Bosphorus looks broadly straight, on ground level it seems to never stop curving and bending like the Riviera coast; every now and then giving way more drastically to create beautiful, blue bays - sometimes wide and sometimes narrow - with little marinas here and there, and always a seafood restaurant or ten going on as they always have done. "They've been here forever," my host tells me.
It is an area that lives off the water. You see it in the many men who can be found fishing from morning to night, or through the constant stream of container ships sailing north and south. They are strangely majestic through their ugliness: gliding serenely in the sunlight, or proceeding quietly and darkly in the night. They are constant but they do not detract from the beauty of the strait. A local billionaire - who has made his money out of the often dubious real estate trade - scoffs at Brits who might compare the Bosphorus with the "shitty River Thames". He is quite right. Whereas no money on earth could induce me to take my chances in London's river, this waterway is so inviting that I would gladly take part in the Cross-Continental swim that happens in the summer (unfortunately, swimming is forbidden for the rest of the year owing to the strong currents and heavy traffic). The waters are clear and, just a short stretch of coast up from where I am staying, they meet the third of three mighty bridges traversing the Bosphorus. Beyond there, the blue water gives way to the Black Sea and beyond there... unhappier lands.
Or, perhaps, I am too quick in that comparison. Istanbul is vibrant, grand and hospitable, but it is one that shows its turbulent history visibly and tangibly.
Some cities are scarred. Take Berlin which, for all its grandeur, both new and old, bears a deep wound which is two bricks wide and runs through the middle of the city where the wall once stood, and it is left there as a lesion - a clear sign of where the city was marked by history. Istanbul has that too. Or, rather, should I say that Byzantium has it too? Or Constantinople? For this is a city that wears its scars beneath centuries-worth of plastic surgery.
As we all know - or as we all hope - time heals all wounds, and the oldest ones in this city are the best healed. The day of the moonrise, I climbed the Galata Tower which is nearly 1,500 years old. It was built by a Byzantine Emperor as a lighthouse. From it, you can see the all of the historic places. Chief among these is the Hagia Sophia, the Basilica which is roughly as old as Galata. In 1054, that holy sight was the place where the Christian church split between East and West. 400 years later, the Ottoman Mehmet II had conquered the city. The Hagia Sophia was changed from being the heart of the Greek Orthodox Church to a Mosque that was the crowning glory of the Ottoman Empire's conquests. It is there that one sees the cosmetic surgery that the city has been given. Old Orthodox mosaics of Christ and Mary have been revealed underneath the crumbling Islamic decorations that still cling on above. The sight is no longer used for worship. The politics are too intractable, and it is now a museum.
Meanwhile, the Galata Tower had been rebuilt by the Genoese and was called Christ Tower. By 1580 however, the tower was being used to detain "forza": the name for Christian POWs. From its giddy and unique perspective, that building saw some of the greatest divisions and bloodshed that religion ever engendered. What pain must this city have endured?
Then, when the Ottoman Empire fell and Ataturk eventually succeeded not as an Emperor but as a President, Turkey began a new age, but a far from settled one. A man on my plane from London said that Ataturk was "more than a prophet to the Turks". The new Republic's first President introduced sovereignty of the people, secularism, the Latin alphabet and surnames - his own meaning "Father of the Turks". However, he did not introduce a modern democracy, and whilst the will of the ballot box has steadily gained respect, the "state" of Turkey has remained a battleground of competing institutions that are frequently opposed to each other. For instance, whilst Turkey has been governed by numerous governments of different colours, many of them have been overthrown by an army which often sees itself as the true guardians of the secular Turkey. The most recent such attempt was last summer, when the army vainly sought to remove President Erdogan.
However, perhaps they were not mistaken in standing up for the secularism that so many Turks hold so dear. Though he would deny that he is doing so, the current President is threatening that national character. Recep Tayip Erdogan is a uniquely successful politician, and his sense of the mood of the people is unparalleled. When he was running for Mayor of Istanbul in 1994, he was caught in a scandal - he had built houses without planning permission. At a debate, he was challenged on this and asked if he would destroy illegal housing. He did some straight-talking, honest politics and said "No, I live in illegal housing." Those who study Turkish elections have a clear consensus: this served to help Erdogan. Why? Because many citizens also lived in illegal housing, and others didn't care.
Erdogan's Islamist, socially conservative, Justice and Develoment Party (AK) speaks for many of the traditional Muslims, especially from the country's more rural areas. Erdogan champions "traditional Muslim values" and (whilst he is seemingly keen on joining the EU), he is not so keen on Western ways. For instance, although alcohol remains legal, it is illegal to advertise alcoholic beverages. It should also be noted that Erdogan has a terrible attitude towards freedom of speech and the press, but this doesn't make him unique amongst his predecessors. This is a country where it is a crime to insult Turkishness and, throughout the history of the Republic, journalists have frequently been tried and media outlets closed by a vengeful state.
Erdogan is mercurial. Across his fifteen years of dominance in Turkish politics, he has at times seemed like the hope for secular liberalism. Now, however, he is anything but. Come Monday morning, he may be the most powerful President in Turkey since Ataturk. The referendum this weekend could abolish the role of Prime Minister and install President Erdogan as Head of State and Government. The role of Parliament will be greatly reduced - they will not even have that most basic of parliamentary rights: control of the budget. In terms of reform, it seems close to the ones enacted by President Medvedev so that Valdimir Putin could resume his position as the ruler of Russia.
Such a move seems thoroughly un-Western. Certainly, it will serve to immobilise Erdogan's ambitions to join the EU, though many speculate that he has never had any intention of joining. The theory is rather, that he uses the hope of doing so as a political tool: he pleases liberals by saying that he wants to join, and then berates the West for stringing Turkey along when it suits him, to the delight of traditionalists. Erdogan's large support seems likely to translate into a referendum victory but (like all the fashionable referenda of this day and age) it looks like it could be tight. Many are wary of the fundamental change this might make to Turkey's character.
From this outsider's perspective, it seems to jar most keenly with the character of Istanbul, which is overwhelmingly a city of the West. This may not seem immediately apparent. English speakers are hard to come by, and the language itself - whilst not a million miles away from continental tongues - is from a totally different family. Whereas in Spain, Italy and even Germany, a native English speaker would have a good chance of deciphering a sign, here you have no touchstones that you can use. As you wander through the landscapes of the suburbs, you are immediately struck by how many minarets you can see. Mosques are alien to a Westerner's eye and they sprout out of the landscape on either side of the Bosphorus like dandelions out of grass. They are beautiful, and your eye is immediately drawn to them. I wondered whether - if I paid attention to how many spires there are in London - I might discover that churches are as ubiquitous at home. My suspicion is that I would not, but of one thing I am sure: whereas Mosques continue to proliferate here, we are not building new churches at home.
But beyond all of this superficiality, on the ground and in the centre of this place, this city harkens to the West. There is a grand financial district that has been copied and pasted from London or Frankfurt or Paris. Think of that island of skyscrapers you can see from the Eiffel Tower - that is what we get in Istanbul.
Meanwhile, the city itself continues that Mediterranean theme. There are times that you could be in a Tuscan town if it weren't for the undulating, urban thrum that accompanies every breath of the town. There are cobbled streets, shaded alleyways, shops that are dedicated to selling the craftwork of the artisan and, despite the disapproval of Mr Erdogan, there are bars. They are not regular, and in the suburbs it is rare to see wine or beer being drunk. However, more people than not drink the local tipple - Rakı - a softer version of absinthe, served with still water and ice. Nevertheless, you can be surprised by the sights you see in the watering holes and eateries. I had not really thought about what I had expected from the drinking culture here, but I never expected to see a Muslim woman drinking a hard-earned Guinness at the end of a day; good things come to those who have had enough of rakı. And then, talking of Western extravagances, I encountered in the suburbs a truly stunning thing - a genuine E-Type Jaguar. If that was not enough, the next car along was a vintage Ferrari. What is more than this, they prove to be utterly civilised by standing on the right of escalators, and doing so far better than Londoners do. The people of Istanbul would fit into any European city with consummate ease, and you sense that their compass pulls them away from the East.
But then, of course, the East is another country. On the other side of this nation, there are the terrible forces of division, war and racism. Syrians pour over the border to refugee camps that (whilst they are made to look like a Holiday Inn in comparison to Calais' jungle) are straining with the pressure. Tensions with the Kurds have rarely been higher - and that really is saying something. The whole picture is a world away from this metropolis that is so comfortable in its modern and peaceful ways that we have the time to spend hours in traffic jams.
Turkey has always been a bridge between two worlds and something of a misfit. We don't know whether to be welcoming or wary, and Turkey itself is torn between the Islamic world and the European. All of which underlines that this country is a key, strategic ally.
Which makes Sunday's referendum all the more troubling. One can see Erdogan's personal conflict - he is not your typical megalomaniac. His family comes from the country's East (though he was born in Istanbul, he regularly returns to the the family home and has opened a Mosque there) and, in an overwhelmingly Muslim country, he represents a large number of conservative Muslims for whom assimilation to the West is terrifying. But there is more at stake here than such fears. An Evet (yes) vote on Sunday will make this country very distant from Europe. Meanwhile, Mr Erdogan's roots as a champion of Islamic values have been trampled under the weight of his ego. His poster adorns the city and his is the biggest cult of personality since Ataturk's. Erdogan appears to be to Turkey and its Republican history what a stray dog is to Istanbul. You see him everywhere, and he is shitting on everything.
So, this land stands on another historical turning point. Though I began writing this on my second full night here, I end it on my last at the Suleyman Mosque - the most majestic and stunning of Istanbul's grand places of worship - and it is bathed in light at the dying of the day. I sip my chai and stare out across to the Golden Horn and to the Galata Tower, and then to the Bosphorus and beyond to Asia. The light is turning from orange again, and any moment now the red moon will rise once more. And it shall be strange and fearsome and grand. But it only rises when the sun is setting.
Wednesday, December 30, 2015
Films of 2015
Given that it is the end of the year, and it is the season of self-indulgence, and I like writing lists, I have written a Films of 2015 list.
This is not a list of what I think to be the undisputedly "Best" films of the year (I haven't seen nearly enough films in order to do that). Rather, these are the films I saw this year which I would recommend most.
10. Bridge of Spies – in the hands of any other director and actor, this would have been merely solid. However, this is a really-good thriller with an old-fashioned feel. It doesn't quite reach the heady heights of some of Spielberg's similar works, but Hanks is on top form with a funny and intriguing script. Good turn from Mark Rylance in this tale of the importance of every individual's rights.
9. Steve Jobs – a witty and interesting look at the enigmatic man behind a corporate personality cult. Uneven though it was, it is one of the most intelligent films you’ll ever see and when it hits top gear it is electric.
9. Steve Jobs – a witty and interesting look at the enigmatic man behind a corporate personality cult. Uneven though it was, it is one of the most intelligent films you’ll ever see and when it hits top gear it is electric.
8. Selma – A powerful film on MLK, with a spellbinding performance from David Oyelowo. It tells an important story well without much bombast.
7. Carol – a beautiful and tender portrait of forbidden love that is played so perfectly by Cate Blanchett and Rooney Mara. Todd Haynes gives it a visual flair (all reflections in windows and glances through thick plumes of cigarette smoke) and evokes the 50s period with delicacy.
7. Carol – a beautiful and tender portrait of forbidden love that is played so perfectly by Cate Blanchett and Rooney Mara. Todd Haynes gives it a visual flair (all reflections in windows and glances through thick plumes of cigarette smoke) and evokes the 50s period with delicacy.
6. Star Wars: Episode
VII – The Force Awakens – J.J. Abrams saves the franchise and gives it heart
and soul and a new lease of life. If you’ve been hitherto unconvinced by Star
Wars, then this is the one to transport you to that galaxy far, far away.
5. The Lady in the
Van – brilliant comic filmmaking, driven by Maggie Smith’s knockout performance
and Alex Jennings terrific incarnation as two sides of Alan Bennett. Bennett’s
script is as poignant as it is hilarious.
4. Brooklyn – a lovely,
lovely film about love, family and home. Saoirse Ronan delivers a thoroughly
deft performance in this emotionally honest elegy which beautifully moves from
comedy to tragedy to hide-behind-your-hands emotional drama.
3. Inside Out – the only
imperfection with this film is that it isn’t really for its young audience. I
cried like a child, but no child could understand why. Heart-breaking and wise –
this will nevertheless be vitally important for slightly older children. A work
of heart and genius.
2. The Martian – I
can rarely remember a more joyous experience. I certainly cried once from pure
joy during the "Starman" sequence. A whip-crackingly quick script,
Ridley Scott producing all of his visual flair and Matt Damon being magnificent
as the lead of a great cast. It never dropped its energy or its imagination,
and had me enraptured from start to finish. What more can one reasonably ask of
the cinema?
1. Whiplash – a near-perfect
little film. Pumped with French Connection-esque adrenaline, tension and
magnetism, this has the sheer cinematic energy you’d expect from an action film.
But it’s a film about men sitting in a room playing drums. It’s an extraordinary
achievement that thrills, terrifies and exhilarates from the first percussive
beat to the last. Miles Teller is a revelation, but J.K. Simmons is a master.
(And two to look out
for that haven’t yet come out on general release)
High-Rise – A bizarre
and unsettling film about social collapse, where every inch of every frame
appears to have been meticulously and beautifully designed.
Trumbo – A very
timely film about the screenwriter who was blacklisted during the days of
McCarthyism. It tells the story with oodles of wit and charm, and doesn’t beat
you over the head with its message. Features a terrific big screen turn from
Bryan Cranston.
Thursday, December 10, 2015
NByNW Diary: Bidding Process to host EU Referendum Result "Mired in Secrecy"
10th
December
Manchester has the won the not-so-much coveted right to host
the result of the EU referendum. The Electoral Commission
announced the news this morning, but has attracted criticism for not
holding a formal bidding process and there are even accusations of corruption.
No sooner had the EC announced the decision, then Cornwall
announced that they were launching a probe into possible corruption, using a
legal team drawn from their large French population.
“It is highly suspicious,” said the Mayor of Truro, who had
led their David-versus-Goliath bid to host the result. “There’s been no
transparency in this. What has Manchester got that Truro hasn’t?”
The Electoral Commission says that the decision was made
after much consideration and has nothing to do with throwing yet another bone
to the publicity machine behind the idea of a Northern Powerhouse.
The decision has drawn much interest from international
figures. Seb Coe said that he was sure that the bids were considered properly,
although there doesn’t seem to be much evidence supporting that view.
International expert on secretive bidding
processes Sepp Blatter said “The Electoral Commission was in a battle between
the devil and the angels, and I have no doubt that the authorities have sided
with the angels. In this case, the angels of Manchester. If anything, their
bidding process has not been secretive enough.”
Follow North by North Westminster on Twitter: https://twitter.com/NByNWestminster
Like our Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/northbynorthwestminster?fref=nf
Follow us on SoundCloud: https://soundcloud.com/north-by-north-westminster
Tuesday, December 8, 2015
NByNW Diary: Statement on Preventing Donalds Immigrating
Tuesday 8th
December
North by N. Westminster is calling for a total and complete
shutdown on people called Donald entering the United Kingdom until our
representatives can figure out what the hell is going on. According to the weary
anger on social media, there is a lot of discontent towards one man called
Donald, and we see no reason why we shouldn’t judge the entire group of people
called Donald on the basis of the actions of one rambling extremist who preaches
hate, prejudice and in favour of bombing.
In a statement, we said “Without looking into the issue in any great detail, it is obvious that the racist rhetoric of all Donalds is incomprehensible. Where this lunacy comes from and why we will have to determine. Until we are able to determine and understand this problem and the dangerous threat it poses, our country cannot be the victim of the stupefyingly damaging and batshit crazy comments from people that believe only in simple blanket answers to complex questions, and have no sense of reason or respect for human diversity, human harmony or human hair.
Follow North by North Westminster on Twitter: https://twitter.com/NByNWestminster
Like our Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/northbynorthwestminster?fref=nf
Follow us on SoundCloud: https://soundcloud.com/north-by-north-westminster
Friday, December 4, 2015
NByNW Diary: UKIP's Implications Leave us Little Room to Infer
1.00am
In the end, it wasn’t a catastrophe for Labour. Not even
close. Jim McMahon held Michael Meacher's long-held seat of Oldham West and Royton comfortably with a majority of 10,811
(given the reduction in turnout, that’s broadly the same result as in May 2015).
This was contrary to the reports which had been put about by
many of the perennial arms of the Murdoch and Right Wing Press, namely The
Guardian and The
New Statesman.
Ultimately, no-one expected Labour to lose, but no-one can
use this result (as they expected to be able to) to claim that Jeremy Corbyn is
a doomed prospect.
However, UKIP will use any fact to prove anything, and what
this result apparently shows is that a bunch of people who look different have imposed
their will on people who don’t look different. If UKIPers get upset with me
when they infer that that was what I thought their Deputy Leader Paul
Nuttall was implying when he said that Labour had engaged in “dangerous
identity politics”, then let me say that he implied and I inferred. And I inferred from his implications that the phrase "identity politics" was undoubtedly attempting to divide people on the grounds of race. Which is, if I am right in this assessment, entirely shit.
Furthermore, Mr Farage says that the Postal Vote was bent. He claims
this comes from an impeccable source. Easy to tweet, but you better
substantiate it you frog-faced divisor.
Evidence from an impeccable source that today's postal voting was bent.
— Nigel Farage (@Nigel_Farage) December 4, 2015
Have I got it wrong? If so, please explain to me
how? I’d so hate to think you’re bigots simply because you’d left some grey
area on that matter. I normally like my non-bigots to be unequivocally
non-bigots, and explicitly non-bigots. But, you know, maybe that’s too much for
me to expect from a 21st century multicultural democracy.
P.S. If you didn't want me to misinterpret, you might have tried speaking clearly rather than insinuating. After all, if you're not bigots, why would you feel the need to obfuscate.
P.S. If you didn't want me to misinterpret, you might have tried speaking clearly rather than insinuating. After all, if you're not bigots, why would you feel the need to obfuscate.
Thursday, December 3, 2015
NByNW Diary: Hilary Benn's Mysterious Phone Call
6.00am
Hilary Benn wakes up. Same time as he does every day.
Nothing feels any different from any other day.
6.01am
Hilary Benn’s phone rings. He answers
“Hampsted 001138, Benn Household, Mr Benn speaking.”
“Is it safe?” says the posh voice on the other end of the
line.
“I hope so,” says Mr Benn. “I’m still in my pyjamas”.
“You cannot know who I am.”
“You sound like Tristram Hunt.”
“No, no. I’m definitely not him.”
“I’ll take your word for it,” said Mr Benn, putting his
trade mark specs on.
“I am a member of the insurgency.”
“Insurgency?” asked Hilary.
“Against Jeremy Corbyn.”
“I thought he was the insurgency.”
“We’re the insurgency against the insurgency,” said the posh
voice.
“That’s rather confusing. Like a party with a leader and
foreign secretary with completely different foreign policies.”
“Okay. We’re like the rebellion in Star Wars.”
“Don’t let a Corbynista hear you say that,” warned Mr Benn. “They’ll
beat you to death with a plastic lightsabre.”
“The point is – we’re trying to save the Labour party from
Corbyn.”
“Oh, but he’s a decent man and he has a mandate,” said Mr
Benn.
“No! Hilary – your speech last night. It’s changed the way
people see you. People are talking of you as a future leader. A future Prime
Minister.”
“Oh – I’m not interested in that. I just want to do my job and
my duty and then come home and cook excellent vegetarian food, washed down with
ginger beer.”
“No!” said the voice once more. “It has to be you.”
“Look, last night I just spoke from my conscience and said
what I thought was right.”
“Yes, and it was the first time a Labour moderate did that
since Robin Cook. It was electrifying.”
“I just want to go and have my Corn Flakes and go to work.”
“Look – when Corbyn speaks from his conscience, all of his
fans think that he’s some kind of vegan, atheist Jesus. When one of us speaks
from his conscience, the Corbynistas think that we’re evil, agnostic Jesus. But
you could be different.”
“I want an atmosphere of free debate and to work with the
elected leader of the Labour Party.”
“Fine!” shouted the angry voice. “Do you not want power?”
“No.”
“Oh,” replied the other voice, audibly shocked. “Really? I
don’t understand.”
“I just spoke my mind not because I wanted to advance my
career but because I thought it was right. You’d think that a supporter of
Corbyn would admire that.”
“You think they might?” asked the voice.
“I hope they will,” said Benn.
“Good luck with that.”
Our preview of today's Oldham West and Royton By-Election is here:
Follow North by North Westminster on Twitter: https://twitter.com/NByNWestminster
Like our Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/northbynorthwestminster?fref=nf
Follow us on SoundCloud: https://soundcloud.com/north-by-north-westminster
Wednesday, December 2, 2015
NByNW Diary: Benn Steals the Day by Opposing a Bennite
Wednesday 2nd December
It has been the sort of day which
encapsulates the best and worst of our democracy.
The best in that the most
important issue of all – the matter of war and peace – was openly discussed in
great depth and at great length.
The worst in that those who made
mistakes in the heat of the moment were too proud to apologise for it.
Last night, the Prime Minister
let his legendary temper get the better of him and said to those Tory
backbenchers who were going to vote against military action in Syria that they
would be voting with (amongst others) “terrorist sympathisers”. It was
insulting and unstatesmanlike, and at the start of today’s epic debate he
attempted to play down the scandal, but like a child who was being told to say
sorry for something he didn’t feel sorry about, David Cameron did not
apologise.
Then 10 hours of debate followed.
Numerous speeches were excellent. Both for and against. Yvette Cooper, Margaret
Beckett, Andrew Tyrie, Sir Alan Duncan, Angus Roberston all excelled
themselves, to name but a few. Hell, even Tim Farron rose to the occasion. In
contrast, David Cameron was hampered by his outburst the previous evening, and
Jeremy Corbyn was halting and lacking in coherence.
However, like many a
Shakespearean drama, the best moment came from the subplot, which has been
about the Labour party and the divisions within it. It was encapsulated when
Hilary Benn stood up to speak against his leader’s position.
Benn’s famous father Tony may not
have delivered the speech that his son did tonight, but he was somehow, seminally present. His son stood up for what he believed. He spoke with passion
and verve and if you closed your eyes just a bit you could have seen his
progenitor in the mannerisms and gesticulations that he used. When talking of
the “fascists” of Daesh who hold everyone else in contempt, he produced a grand
sweep of his arm as he pointed to every member of the House. It was a Bennite
expression, and will live long in the memory.
Hilary Benn’s speech was about
the matter at hand and he made a clear case. But the speech was also about the
soul of the Labour party. His leader sat grim-faced behind him, and he got
grimmer and grimmer as Benn’s rhetoric soared and drew purrs of approval from
the opposition benches behind. It spoke of Labour’s role in founding the UN, in
being a party of internationalism. It was not just opposed to his leader’s view
on Syria, but to his leader’s foreign policy almost entirely.
As Daniel Finkelstein noted this
morning, after the 1970 election defeat his father asked Harold Wilson whether he
still had to speak with the opinion of the Shadow Cabinet. Today, his son took
on that spirit but the irony of all ironies is this: Hilary Benn tried to
reclaim the soul of the Labour party from a Bennite.
His speech was greeted with
applause (unparliamentary, but allowed by the fastidious Speaker Bercow), and
cries of “outstanding”. His opposite number, Philip Hammond, called it one of
the great speeches. When he sat down next to Jeremy Corbyn the tension was
palpable. John McDonnell looked crestfallen. The speech of the day had been
given in opposition to their position and by their own Foreign Secretary.
Whether you agree with his
conclusions or not, to see someone to speak with such passion and energy and
conviction and good conscience and import in such extraordinary circumstances
is the true celebration of what our Mother of all Parliaments gives a platform
for.
The votes began and a hush
descended before the result was announced. The motion was carried by 397 to
223: a majority of 174. The word was that 15 Labour waverers were swayed by Benn.
A severe moment, and it is worth
echoing the words of Toby Perkins (Labour, Chesterfield) from the debate: “I
envy those who describe this choice as a “no brainer”… It’s not been obvious to
me, it’s been very, very difficult indeed.” He voted against military action.
Labels:
Andrew Tyrie,
Angus Robertson,
Comment,
Daesh,
David Cameron,
Hilary Benn,
ISIS,
Jeremy Corbyn,
John McDonnell,
Labour,
Margaret Beckett,
North by North Westminster,
Politics,
Sir Alan Duncan,
Syria,
Yvette Cooper
Monday, November 30, 2015
NByNW Diary: Beating Drums
Monday 30th November
Drums. Drums in the deep.
Today, drums in the deep for
Jeremy Corbyn. He walked in confident into his Shadow Cabinet meeting. After
all, he had received a 3-to-1 measure of support from party members and was
sure that the mood had swung behind him.
But he thought this was about the
debate over the war. He was wrong.
Shadow Cabinet Members both for
and against airstrikes said that they thought that the leadership could not
impose its will on this, taking particular ire against the Labour Leader’s infamous
letter on Friday – whilst internal party discussions were ongoing.
According to The New Statesman, Corbyn was adamant until he realised that Hilary
Benn would retire to the backbenches to voice his support for strikes, and that
significant numbers of his Shadow Cabinet would perform their own strike by
refusing to leave the room until he relented and gave them not only a free
vote, but also leave Labour’s official position unaltered.
Corbyn foiled by a sit-in protest.
Even he must see the irony, but he must also know that his assassins are just
waiting and waiting and waiting for Corbyn’s very own Ides of March.
Drums in the deep too for Labour
in general. None of them comes out well from this, and on Thursday they face a
by-election in Oldham. They are still favourites to win but with a majority
down from nearly 14,000 to just 2,000. It is easy to just blame it on Corbyn,
but this sort of division and adolescent infighting from all sides in the party
surely have not helped their electability.
Finally, drums in the deep for
war. At least, that would be the dramatic way to conclude this. The truth is
that not just a war but war upon wars have been raging for years now. Nor are
we seemingly about to join it. We already have. We are potentially about to
expand our operation from Iraq to Syria. This is not the crucial moment but a prequel
to it.
The drums in the deep shall beat for a good
while longer yet.
More content from North by North Westminster is abundant. Below is a story on Philip Hammond's extraordinary excuse for accepting a gift some £1,810 above the government limit.
Follow North by North Westminster on Twitter: https://twitter.com/NByNWestminster
Like our Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/northbynorthwestminster?fref=nf
Follow us on SoundCloud: https://soundcloud.com/north-by-north-westminster
Friday, November 27, 2015
NByNW Diary: Should Corbyn Stay or Should He Go If He Decides Not To Rock the Casbahs?
I’m going to get some letter
paper headed up with “It’s been another bad day for Labour”. It seems
increasingly useful. After all, no-one can claim that Labour have had a good
day, but there’s cacophonous squabbling over whose fault that is.
Here’s what’s happened.
Yesterday, after the Prime
Minister’s statement on Syria, the Shadow Cabinet went to go and discuss the
matter. There was a split in the opinion. Which was fine. It was decided that a
decision would be taken on Monday through the Shadow Cabinet and the
Parliamentary Labour Party. So far so good.
Then, Hilary Benn went out and
said that there was a “compelling” case for strikes. Two hours later, Jeremy
Corbyn wrote a letter to Labour MPs saying that he could not support the
strikes because he does not think that they can assist our security.
Cue outrage against Corbyn from
Labour MPs, describing this as an attempt to whip up fervour amongst the grassroots
pressure group Momentum, in order to scare Labour MPs into voting against their
consciences but with the leadership.
Very odd this. It appears that it
was wrong of Corbyn to express his opposition, but it was fine for Benn to
express his support. Whilst private discussions are ongoing, both men were ill-advised.
Labour Party Members are furious.
After all, 6 out of 10 of them voted for this man and they are tired of the Parliamentary
Party constantly sniping at him. Furthermore, Labour Party Members are 2 to 1 against the strikes, according to
YouGov. Surely, Labour MPs should take this into account?
Ah, but they also need to take
into account their constituents, and the same YouGov Poll says that the general
public are 2 to 1 in favour of the
strikes.
It is a fraught situation, but,
nevertheless, the Labour Party looks shambolic, childish and petulant.
Just to throw yet another spanner
in the works, Corbynista and the world’s newest campaigner for mental health
awareness, Ken Livingstone, was on Question
Time, where he said that Tony Blair’s decision to invade Iraq killed 52
Londoners in the 7/7 bombings, and he repeated the bombers’ justification that
they only murdered because of Iraq.
Whether or not he has got a point
doesn’t matter much because, so far as it goes now, we are at the highest level
of risk anyway and have prevented 7 terrorist attacks this year. Iraq did make
us a greater target for terrorist attacks, but the bullseye that conflict
brought on us has never gone away.
Still, why shouldn’t Ken bring up the past?
After all, it’s where he lives.
Follow North by North Westminster on Twitter: https://twitter.com/NByNWestminster
Like our Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/northbynorthwestminster?fref=nf
Follow us on SoundCloud: https://soundcloud.com/north-by-north-westminster
Listen to our regular quiz of smaller news stories, which we call Quiz News. Which was highly original of us.
Thursday, November 26, 2015
NByNW Diary: Beware of Simplicity in the Syria Debate
Thursday 26th November
This is a rather serious entry.
It is also rather long, so for ease it is in sections. The first concerns the
events of the Prime Minister’s statement to Parliament on Syria this morning.
The second analyses the strategy. The third looks at where this leaves us.
1. The Prime Minister’s Statement
One of the reasons for my lack of
levity, is that there doesn’t seem to be much to mock. Today, in many ways, saw
the Commons at its best. Normally when the Prime Minister is before the House
there is the braying and roaring and besuited hooliganism that makes this
diarist, as well as countless others, despair. Not so today.
Today, the Prime Minister made
his statement on strategy in Syria, as he builds up for a vote to extend our
airstrikes against ISIS from their current mission in Iraq. He spoke eloquently
and carefully. There was no bombast, but a frank assessment of the matter at
hand and of our ability to deal with it. He proposes that we join the coalition
currently bombing ISIS military targets (arms depots, training facilities, oil
plants, oil convoys etc.), but has confirmed that no western ground forces will
go in (because that doesn’t seem to have gone well in the past). He hopes that
a grand coalition can be born out of the myriad forces in conflict in Syria. As
for legality, the advice is never published, but the recent UN Resolution 2249
authorises “all necessary measures” to defeat ISIS.
In response, Jeremy Corbyn asked
seven pertinent questions. The Prime Minister answered them in a yes/no style,
with further elaboration on each point. Angus Robertson of the SNP took a
stronger stance against the proposed strikes, but argued his case and reiterated
key concerns. He said the SNP will not, at present, vote to support airstrikes.
The session was filled with
wisdom and concern, and for a few hours in the morning the frequent cynicism
that I feel towards our democratic institution faded.
2. Where are the Flaws in the Strategy?
There can be no doubt, as all of
the aforementioned leaders said, that the threat is real and that the suffering
is too terrible to ignore. That creates the sense that something must be done
but, as Yes Minister fans know, this
leads to the danger of politician’s logic:
1. Something
must be done.
2. This
is something.
3. Therefore,
I must do it.
Mr Corbyn and Mr Roberston are
very right to be cautious, and they raise key issues. Even if these airstrikes
are to be meticulously targeted on ISIS’ considerable military organisation,
they would at best leave a vacuum in a politically turbulent area. It is not
clear what ground forces would be able to secure a military victory, and no
ideological consensus there to provide fertile soil for a victory of hearts and
minds.
Nevertheless, Mr Cameron is
equally right to follow his conscience and make his case. If something must be
done, then to do nothing is such a horrific abnegation of responsibility that
it should leave us with yet more shame on top of that we have accrued so far
this century.
There is likely to be a vote soon
– possibly next week – and it seems probable that the airstrikes will be
authorised. Mr Cameron still has questions to answer about the long-term
strategy, but those who are asking the questions must also seek for alternative
answers. It is not enough to find the holes in this road. You have to fill
them. Given the immense complexity of this situation, it will require people on
all sides to work together.
3. Where Does This Leave Us?
In recent weeks, I have read
opinions that describe the proposed intervention as simply us “wanting to play
with the big boys”. This seems to be very far from the truth when thousands are
being slaughtered in Syria and Iraq, and the threat travels overseas into
museums, bars, music venues and more. It is worth saying again, the threat is
real – not just to us, but to millions of others. If you care about the
migrants who have fled across seas and continents, then you must equally care
about those left behind.
We are wary. We are understandably
wary. As a country, we are racked with guilt and anger over our obvious and
dreadful errors in recent decades. Of course we do not want to repeat them. To
his credit, Mr Cameron cites that recent history – even his own mistakes in
Libya – and claims to be a student of them. Let us hope that he truly is.
However, many fear that this is
just another instance of us sticking our oars into troubled waters only to make
them more troubled still. Perhaps so. That is why this kind of scrutiny and
debate must be celebrated and not scorned. We can never be certain about
anything. All we can do is respectfully listen to all sides and humbly seek as
much information as we can.
But, beware of misinformation.
Beware of catchy memes. Beware of “facts” that get retweeted a thousand times.
For instance, on today’s Daily Politics, Lindsey German of Stop
The War claimed that ISIS was being given arms by Saudi Arabia. It seems to
chime with our fears and reservations of the Saudis. It is immensely plausible,
and is within a 140 character limit. However, Next to her was Malcolm Chalmers,
Director of the respected think tank on such things, the Royal United Services
Institute. He had heard of no such evidence, nor could she actually provide it.
None of this grave situation is simple. Therefore,
above all, beware simplicity.
Follow North by North Westminster on Twitter: https://twitter.com/NByNWestminster
Like our Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/northbynorthwestminster?fref=nf
Follow us on SoundCloud: https://soundcloud.com/north-by-north-westminster
Wednesday, November 25, 2015
NByNW Diary: Osborne's Devil is in His Detail
Wednesday 25th November
In essence, George Osborne’s
Spending Review was like one of those ads on the radio. It’s trying to sell you
the Orgasma-tron 4000, which promises untold realms of utopian hedonism, and
then the voiceover quickly rattles through the smallprint, practically
whispering the words: “Pleasure may go up or down. Terms and conditions apply.
Batteries not included.”
Certainly, there will be cuts in
departmental spending, but police budgets will be maintained, health budgets
will be increased, housing budgets will be increased, schools are being given
budget breaks, and the headline is that the dreaded Tax Credit cuts will now not
happen. Everything seems to be rosier.
But, as ever with Osborne, the
devil is in the detail. Those who were going to lose out on Tax Credits will
still lose the same amount by the end of the decade with the introduction of Universal
Credit. It’s all a question of swinging the axe slower. We wait for the bespectacled
analysts to rake through the smallprint.
Nevertheless, that left Shadow
Chancellor John McDonnell in an awkward position. Responding to Financial
Statements is the hardest job in British politics. You have no advanced sight
of the statement, and it’s made all the harder when you have a cough, and your
opponent has pulled the rug from under you.
What you shouldn’t do if you are
trying to gain public trust on the economy from a far-left position is quote
any controversial Communists in support of your assessment. One can imagine the
nightmare scenario of McDonnell standing at the despatch box, pulling out a
copy of the Little Red Book and quoting Chairman Mao.
Well, there’s no need to imagine.
You can watch McDonnell's Mao McNuggets now on YouTube. Again and again.
Frequent readers have often thought that some of
my inventions are real, or sometimes that something I have reported is a
conjuring from my imagination. After witnessing that, even I’m not sure where
the line is anymore.
More NbyNW content is available, including this story on The Labour Moderates' Secret Code to Bring Down Corbyn:
Follow North by North Westminster on Twitter: https://twitter.com/NByNWestminster
Like our Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/northbynorthwestminster?fref=nf
Follow us on SoundCloud: https://soundcloud.com/north-by-north-westminster
Thursday, November 19, 2015
The North by North Westminster Diary: Does anyone come out well from the Junior Doctors' Strike?
Thursday 19th November
It has become apparent that
health policy is a murky and intriguing world.
After the election, the bastard
Tory Government and Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt felt mandated to introduce a
seven-day NHS, as mortality rates at the weekend are considerably higher than
those during the week and they wanted to rectify this – the murderous villains.
Furthermore, they followed up a promise to invest upwards of £8bn pounds in the
health service so that Simon Stephens, Chief Executive of NHS England, could
impose his plan to “save the NHS”.
Unfortunately, as a consequence
of all this, a new contract for Junior Doctors was introduced, and its details
were controversial. Basically, if you were a JD, you could be expected to work
for up to 15 hours as your normal working time, Monday-Saturday. There were
worries about the quality of service that this quantity of hours would provide,
and about morale within the NHS. Furthermore, when the Government invited the British
Medical Association to talks over the new contract, they were told that 22 out
of the 23 points were non-negotiable. Which was Jeremy being a classic Hunt,
and served to alienate the BMA.
Nevertheless, the BMA did some
spinning of its own. Before any figures were announced, they posted a
calculator on their website announcing that members would see their pay reduced
by 30%. A claim for which they had no evidence. And when the Department of
Health did issue figures, they also put out a guarantee that any individual’s
pay would not go down, apart from those who are already working unsafe levels
of overtime – one of the doctors’ concerns about the new contract.
No matter though, and the BMA
issued a ballot on strike action. At the eleventh hour, the Health Secretary
announced a new contract offer with a headline grabbing 11% increase to the
basic rate of pay and invited the BMA to come to the table for talks; and offer
which they refused. A phrase comes to mind involving horses, stable doors and
bolting.
Now we have the results with 98%
of those balloted supporting a strike which can only impact one group of
people: patients. Jeremy Hunt is, at present, refusing to go to talks at the
conciliatory service ACAS.
So, here we are. The Health
Secretary has been stubborn and evasive. The BMA has been economic with the
truth and evasive. There maybe a genuine wish to protect the sick from both sides,
and both may want a better health service. But rather than meet in the middle,
both appear to have dug in their heels and now patients from the 1st
December can expect a lower quality of care – and it won’t even be a weekend.
One thing does seem to be clear in this murky
and intriguing world: nobody is really coming out well from this.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)









